Where are the boundaries between food, environmentalism and localism?
Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2021 12:36 pm
Where are the boundaries between food, environmentalism and localism?
I suspect everyone may have a different answer to this, it seems prudent to ask the question. The conference has been about food, but it's clear there is a strong undercurrent of environmentalism (specifically sustainability and resilience), and also localism (it's about Highland food, not all food).
Speaking for myself, my political, social and economic outlook is radically localist and grew out of my concern for the environment. My interest in food (production, distribution, security) similarly stems from my environmental concerns and a desire for positive change. For me food, environmentalism and localism are completely enmeshed. The priorities and outlook of others may differ. That's a good thing, if we all thought the same thoughts the world would be a very boring place and it would be a huge waste of thought-capacity.
There are practical reasons for asking this question too. In order to implement many of the great ideas that the conference has engendered some level of formal organisation will be required. How much of this can be done within existing environmentally focussed groups? How much crossover should there be?
I suspect everyone may have a different answer to this, it seems prudent to ask the question. The conference has been about food, but it's clear there is a strong undercurrent of environmentalism (specifically sustainability and resilience), and also localism (it's about Highland food, not all food).
Speaking for myself, my political, social and economic outlook is radically localist and grew out of my concern for the environment. My interest in food (production, distribution, security) similarly stems from my environmental concerns and a desire for positive change. For me food, environmentalism and localism are completely enmeshed. The priorities and outlook of others may differ. That's a good thing, if we all thought the same thoughts the world would be a very boring place and it would be a huge waste of thought-capacity.
There are practical reasons for asking this question too. In order to implement many of the great ideas that the conference has engendered some level of formal organisation will be required. How much of this can be done within existing environmentally focussed groups? How much crossover should there be?